How Bitcoin Uses Public Key Cryptography - Security, Keys & Recent Upgrades

Posted by Victoria McGovern
Comments (1)
16
Oct
How Bitcoin Uses Public Key Cryptography - Security, Keys & Recent Upgrades

Bitcoin Key & Address Generator

How This Works

This tool demonstrates the cryptographic process described in the article:

  • Private key → Public key (compressed/uncompressed)
  • Public key → Bitcoin address (P2PKH and Bech32 formats)

Example: 5d81a0d8c6a2e64d6d3d2c1c5f3c4f0f3e6c7d5d2c1b0d5a8f6c7d5c3b4a5d2c3b4a5d
Use this tool to create valid keys.
Important: This is for educational purposes only. Never enter real private keys in untrusted tools. Your actual funds require proper security measures.

Key Takeaways

  • Bitcoin relies on Bitcoin public key cryptography built around the secp256k1 elliptic curve.
  • Private keys are 256‑bit integers; public keys are derived points on the curve and never expose the private key.
  • ECDSA protected Bitcoin for over a decade, while Schnorr signatures and Taproot now provide smaller, faster, and more private transactions.
  • Quantum computers pose a long‑term risk, but the network can soft‑fork to post‑quantum schemes.
  • Best practices - use deterministic wallets, verify address formats, and never reuse keys across networks.

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency that operates on a peer‑to‑peer network without a central authority. Its entire trust model rests on a single cryptographic primitive: Public key cryptography is an asymmetric encryption technique where a pair of mathematically linked keys - a private key and a public key - serve different functions. In Bitcoin’s case, the public key does not encrypt data; it simply proves that the holder of the matching private key signed a transaction.

1. The Core Curve - secp256k1

secp256k1 is the specific elliptic curve defined by the equation y² = x³ + 7 over a prime field that Bitcoin adopts for its key operations. The prime field is 2²⁵⁶ - 2³² - 977, providing roughly 2¹²⁸ security against brute‑force attacks. Compared to RSA‑3072, secp256k1 gives the same security level with a 256‑bit key, shaving off more than 85% of the data size.

2. From Private to Public - How Keys Are Made

Private key is a 256‑bit random integer kept secret by the wallet owner; it is the only secret that can create a valid signature. To generate a key pair, software picks a numberkin the range 1…n‑1 (where n is the curve order, about 2²⁵⁶). The Public key is derived from the private key by multiplying it with the curve’s base point G, yielding a point (x,y) on secp256k1. Bitcoin supports two encodings:

  • Uncompressed: 65bytes, prefix 0x04, followed by 32‑byte x and 32‑byte y.
  • Compressed: 33bytes, prefix 0x02 or 0x03 depending on the parity of y, followed by the x coordinate. Since BIP12 (2012) the compressed form is the default.

3. Signing Transactions - ECDSA

Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) is the signature scheme Bitcoin used from its inception to prove ownership of a private key. The process works like this:

  1. Hash the transaction data with SHA‑256 (producing a 256‑bit digest).
  2. Generate a random noncekfor each signature; compute the point (x₁,y₁) = k·G.
  3. The signature consists of two numbers (r,s) where r = x₁ mod n and s = k⁻¹ (hash + privateKey·r) mod n.
  4. Verification recomputes a point using r,s, the public key, and the hash; if the resulting x‑coordinate equals r, the signature is valid.

Typical DER‑encoded signatures are 71‑73bytes. Verification on a standard laptop takes about 500-700ms - slower than symmetric cryptography but acceptable for a decentralized network where each node must verify every transaction.

Masked cryptographer signing a transaction with hash vortex and crystal shards, robot verifying.

4. Why ECC Beats RSA in Bitcoin

ECC vs. RSA for Bitcoin‑style Security
Metricsecp256k1 (ECC)RSA‑3072
Key size256bits3072bits
Signature size~72bytes (DER)~384bytes
Security level≈128‑bit≈128‑bit
Bandwidth impact per transactionMinimalSignificant

The smaller footprint matters because every Bitcoin node must download, store, and relay every transaction. A leaner signature cuts bandwidth and storage needs dramatically.

5. The Schnorr Upgrade - Faster, Safer, Aggregatable

Schnorr signatures were introduced to Bitcoin via BIP340 in 2021, offering linearity and aggregation benefits over ECDSA. Two key advantages:

  • Signature size is fixed at 64bytes, removing the variable DER overhead.
  • Multiple signatures can be combined into a single aggregate signature (MuSig2), reducing the size of multisig transactions by up to 25%.

Because Schnorr signatures are provably secure under the same discrete‑logarithm assumption as ECDSA, they did not require a hard fork beyond a soft‑fork flag activation. The change also paved the way for the Taproot upgrade.

6. Taproot - Privacy Meets Flexibility

Taproot is a soft‑fork upgrade (BIP341) that combines Schnorr signatures with Merklized Abstract Syntax Trees (MAST). What this means for everyday users:

  • Complex scripts (e.g., escrow, multisig, time‑locks) are hidden unless they are exercised. In most cases, only the aggregated public key and a single Schnorr signature appear on‑chain.
  • Transaction size drops 4‑6% for typical complex scripts, translating to lower fees.
  • Privacy improves because observers cannot tell which script branch was used.

Taproot also introduced new sighash flags (TAPROOT) that give developers finer control over which parts of a transaction are signed, reducing accidental data exposure.

7. Common Pitfalls & Best Practices

Even though wallets hide the math, users still stumble over key management:

  1. Mixing formats. A private key stored as a 64‑character hex string cannot be directly imported into a wallet that expects WIF (Base58Check) encoding. Converting the format incorrectly can render funds unspendable.
  2. Reusing keys across networks. Sending the same private key to Bitcoin, Litecoin, and test‑net opened a 2019 phishing attack that drained 243 users’ funds.
  3. Ignoring address derivation. Bitcoin addresses are not the raw public key; they are HASH160(publicKey) with a version byte and checksum. Sending to a raw public key will fail.
  4. Not backing up seed phrases. Hierarchical Deterministic (HD) wallets follow BIP32/BIP39. Losing the 12‑ or 24‑word mnemonic means every derived key is lost forever.

Recommended practices:

  • Use HD wallets that follow BIP44/BIP84 for SegWit addresses.
  • Verify that the public key hash matches the address before sending funds.
  • Store seed phrases offline, preferably in a fire‑proof safe.
  • Consider hardware wallets certified to FIPS 140‑2 Level3 for institutional compliance.
Three ninja figures merge signatures into a single sigil above a Bitcoin leaf with a glowing Merkle tree.

8. Quantum Threats & Future‑Proofing

Shor’s algorithm would break ECDSA and Schnorr signatures instantly if a sufficiently large, error‑corrected quantum computer appeared. Grover’s algorithm only gives a quadratic speed‑up against SHA‑256, so the hash function remains relatively safer.

NIST’s 2022 post‑quantum roadmap suggests a migration path via soft forks. Researchers are already prototyping lattice‑based signatures (e.g., Dilithium) that could replace ECDSA without changing the address format.

Most experts agree that practical quantum attacks are unlikely before 2035, giving the Bitcoin community a decade‑plus window to transition. The network’s ability to adopt new consensus rules through soft forks (as demonstrated by Taproot) is the biggest defensive asset.

9. Putting It All Together - A Quick Workflow for Developers

  1. Generate a BIP39 seed (mnemonic) and derive the master extended key (BIP32).
  2. Derive a child key using the path m/84'/0'/0'/0/0 for native SegWit (bech32) addresses.
  3. Obtain the 256‑bit private key; compute the compressed public key (33bytes).
  4. Create a transaction, hash it with SHA‑256 twice, and sign using either ECDSA (legacy) or Schnorr (Taproot).
  5. Attach the appropriate sighash flag (e.g., SIGHASH_DEFAULT for Taproot) and broadcast.

This flow is what libraries like Bitcoin Core, libsecp256k1, and BitcoinJS implement under the hood.

10. FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Bitcoin use ECC instead of RSA?

ECC provides the same 128‑bit security with a 256‑bit key, drastically reducing signature and transaction size. In a network where every node must process every transaction, that bandwidth savings is critical.

What is the difference between a compressed and uncompressed public key?

An uncompressed key includes both x and y coordinates (65bytes). A compressed key stores only the x coordinate and a prefix (0x02 or 0x03) that indicates the parity of y, cutting the size to 33bytes. Since BIP12, most wallets default to the compressed format.

How do Schnorr signatures improve multisig transactions?

Schnorr signatures are linear, meaning signatures from multiple participants can be mathematically combined into a single 64‑byte aggregate signature. This reduces the on‑chain data for a 2‑of‑3 multisig from ~150bytes to ~70bytes, saving fees and improving privacy.

Can I still use ECDSA after Taproot activation?

Yes. Existing legacy wallets continue to use ECDSA. Taproot is optional; transactions that don’t employ the new script paths simply behave as before.

What should I do if I lose my seed phrase?

Unfortunately, without the seed phrase you cannot reconstruct the private keys. The only mitigation is to back up the phrase securely before any loss occurs. Some custodial services offer key‑recovery mechanisms, but they rely on third‑party trust.

Understanding the cryptographic backbone of Bitcoin gives you confidence when moving, storing, or building on top of the network. By mastering key generation, signature creation, and the latest upgrades, you stay ahead of both security risks and the ever‑evolving developer landscape.

1 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Jessica Cadis

    October 16, 2025 AT 09:38

    The switch to secp256k1 was a no‑brainer; any sane dev knows ECC slashes bandwidth like a hot knife through butter. If you're still clinging to RSA, you're basically inviting bloat and slower confirmations. The curve gives us 128‑bit security with a pocket‑size key – perfect for a peer‑to‑peer system. Stop debating the math, start building.

Write a comment

*

*

*